NEWSFLASH – Patent on Protein

 

NEWSFLASH – MONSANTO GRANTED PROTEIN PATENT

Washington DC…   After around the clock negotiations with USDA officials, the U.S. Patent Office, and representatives from the Dept. of HEW, Dept. of State, and Dept. of Treasury, Monsanto’s legal counsel presented their agreement to the U.S. Supreme Court.  On a five to four vote, the Court approved the agreement and awarded a patent on protein to Monsanto Corporation of St. Louis, MO

The patent was issued under the new intellectual property rights regulations that passed Congress last week.  The President signed the landmark “Virtual Reality” bill yesterday. In a Rose Garden ceremony at the White House, President Richard Weed declared that this would not “fix everything” but that he was “confident that this is a step in the right direction” and that “this fixation on facts and observations” will soon become a thing of the past.  “Now is the time for creative vision” were his closing words at the brief ceremony before a small crowd of journalists and photographers and Monsanto employees, including several congressmen and senators.

Monsanto’s attorneys presented the case that Monsanto had invented protein after a long and expensive process carried on in a parallel universe over five billion years ago.  Food producers whose products contain protein will now be required to purchase a license and pay royalties.  Richard Head, Lead Attorney for Monsanto, declined to comment on plans for seeking reparations for previous unlicensed protein production except to say “We’re looking into it.”

A senior Monsanto executive, who asked not to be named, said, “This is a tribute to the U.S. legal system that corrects injustice and protects the rights of the people.”  Another Monsanto executive who is member of the “Protein and Consciousness Committee”, who asks to remain anonymous, stated, “This is a far reaching decision that will eventually reposition the current notion of intellectual property rights.”  A high ranking executive in Monsanto’s Financial Division stated, off the record, that “these fees and royalties should bring in somewhere between a hundred zillion to a gazillion dollars annually”.

 

Earth’s Melting Ice

When I see reports that Earth’s ice is melting at the rate of x cubic miles or x cubic kilometers per year I have a hard time getting that in perspective.

Then, I find something that is in tons of ice per year and I can relate to tons of ice…….. as in tons of air conditioning.

The Air Conditioning Industry uses “tons” as one way of rating the capacity of air conditioning units.  One ton of A/C provides the same cooling as melting one ton of ice in 24 hours.

Before the advent of refrigeration, cooling was done with ice. Millions of tons of ice were harvested from America’s rivers and lakes and ponds and stored in caves and pits and insulated buildings that preserved the ice well up in to the summer. The ice was stored and later distributed to provide some degree of cooling. Harvesting and distributing    ice started before the American Revolution. It is not hard to imagine that when refrigeration units first came on the scene everyone’s frame of reference for cooling was some quantity of ice. Today we still use “tons” to describe the size of air conditioning equipment. More technically, we also use BTUs to rate the capacity of air conditioning equipment.

One BTU is the amount of heat required to raise one pound of water one degree F.      A ton of air conditioning moves 11,917 BTUs of heat per hour. At that rate, 286,000 BTUs of heat will be moved in 24 hours. If you have a ton of ice at 32 degrees and you add 286,000 BTUs you will have a ton of water at 32 degrees. The 286,000 BTUs is now “stored” as latent heat in the ton of water. This is the effect of one ton of air conditioning.

Today, a four ton A/C unit is commonly installed to cool a 2000 sq. ft. home. It will remove the amount of heat that it would take to melt four tons of ice in 24 hours. The amount of heat it takes to melt four tons of ice is 1,144,000 BTUs. That melting has no time element but the A/C Industry chose the 24 hours time frame as their standard for rating their equipment.

A recent article from NASA states that the Earth lost 4.3 trillion tons of ice from 2003 to 2010. To get this into air conditioning perspective we need to divide 4.3 trillion tons by 7 years to get 614.3 billion tons of ice melting per year. Then we need to divide by 365 days to get 1.68 billion tons of ice melting per day. That is equivalent to 1.68 billion tons of air conditioning. That equals 481.3 trillion BTUs per day.

If we think of the size of our home air conditioners, 481.3 trillion BTUs would require 420 million 4 ton air conditioners. Or if you live in a small apartment with a 1.5 ton unit, it would be 1.1 billion of these smaller air conditioners.

A 4 ton air conditioner has a foot print of about 10 sq. ft. which would allow 4356 units to cover an acre. When we divide 420 million units by 4356 units per acre, we see that this is equal to 96,418 acres of 4 ton air conditioners. At 640 acres per square mile, this is a field of 4 ton air conditioners that is ten miles long by fifteen miles wide. Or one mile wide and a hundred fifty miles long. I live near Texarkana in Arkansas which is on the Texas border. These 420 million 4 ton a/c units would cover a field that extends a half a mile  on each side of Interstate 30. That field would extend from the Texas/Arkansas state line all the way past Little Rock.

All those air conditioners running 24/7/365 would equal the cooling power of the rate of melting of Earth’s ice during that 2003 to 2010 time period. In reality, that many a/c condensing units in that close proximity would not function properly as there is no room for the heat to dissipate. This example is to illustrate how many air conditioners it would take to provide the same cooling as the melting ice if all the a/c units were working properly 24 hours a day for 7 years.

This daily ice melt of 1.68 billion tons requires 481.3 trillion BTUs of heat.

481.3 trillion BTUs is equivalent to burning 20 million cords of Oak fire wood every day,

or 3.85 billion gals. of gasoline…..every day,

or 19.3 million tons of coal……….. Which is enough to fill over 150,000 coal car loads which is over a thousand train loads of coal every day.

That much fuel would have to be burned every day to melt 4.3 trillion tons of ice during those 7 years.

The average Coal fired power plant in the U.S. produce approximately 500 Mega- Watts. The energy to melt 1.68 billion tons of ice per day would require the output of 11,755 of these 500 MW power plants. The super efficient John Turk power plant that opened in Fulton AR in 2012 is a 600 MW power plant. It would only require 9,795 plants of this capacity.

So where did all this heat come from that melted the 4.3 trillion tons of ice?

It came from the Sun.

We have ancient sunshine in hydrocarbons that we burn. We have current sunshine in the biomass and carbohydrates that we burn and in the direct incoming solar radiation. We have some geothermal heat on Earth from geological processes,  but most of the energy that is heat on Earth has come from the Sun. At the best conditions we have about 1000 watts per square meter of incoming sunshine to the surface of the Earth. This is approximately equal to a 100W light bulb on every sq. ft.                                  We are now reradiating less energy back to space than in the past because of the infrared reflective effect of increasing greenhouse gases. Much of that heat that is being retained is now stored in the latent heat of fusion in the water that was formerly Earth’s ice.

Earth is warming far more than is indicated by our record high air and water temperatures. We don’t need instrumentation or computer models to see the melting ice.

The reference to train car loads of coal is from “Coal Trains” by John McPhee.

 

 

 

What Do The Risk Experts Think?

What Do The Risk Experts Think?                                                          2/2/15

 

President Obama told NBC News anchor Savannah Guthrie, “You should get your kids vaccinated.”

“I understand that there are families that, in some cases, are concerned about the effect of vaccinations,” Obama said. “The science is, you know, pretty indisputable. We’ve looked at this again and again. There is every reason to get vaccinated, but there aren’t reasons to not.”

The President gets a bit tongue tied when he tries to imply that there is no risk involved with immunization.

The U.S. Govt. has paid out over three billion dollars for vaccine related injuries through the VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM (VICP) of the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.

“On October 1, 1988, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-660) created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). The VICP was established to ensure an adequate supply of vaccines, stabilize vaccine costs, and establish and maintain an accessible and efficient forum for individuals found to be injured by certain vaccines. The VICP is a no-fault alternative to the traditional tort system for resolving vaccine injury claims that provides compensation to people found to be injured by certain vaccines. The U. S. Court of Federal Claims decides who will be paid. Three Federal government offices have a role in the VICP:”   http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/index.html

The above paragraph tells us that the U.S. Govt. must change all the rules of product liability in order for the vaccine makers to produce “an adequate supply of vaccines. Then the govt. must release them from all responsibilities for their actions. “We The People” are now underwriting the risk of damages from vaccines.

This begs the question of where the experts on risk stand on this issue. Professional underwriters, (aka…. The Insurance Companies…) have a several hundred year old tradition of looking at the risks in an endeavor and applying their actuarial skills to place a monetary value on assuming that risk. These experts put their money where their mouth is and they are well compensated. The Insurance industry has assets in the hundreds of billions of dollars because the underwriters are good at assessing risk.

When the Insurance Industry allowed the U.S. Govt. to assume the risk for vaccine injury we can assume that one of two things happened. Either the risk was so great that the price of the premiums was more than the pharmaceutical companies were willing to spend.                                                                                                                              Or the risk was too great at any price.

In the first case you would think that the underwriters would present their price for liability coverage and the pharmaceutical companies would add it to the price of their vaccine just like they do for liability with all their other drugs.                                         The Insurance Industry gets its cut of the action. It’s the American way.                     This case of the federal government taking away the opportunity for an American insurance company to sell premiums is pure socialism. If the Insurance Industry had seen any way to make a profit underwriting the risks of vaccines you can be sure that the U.S. Govt. would not have taken their business.

That leaves case number two…… The risk was too great at any price.

I can’t see a rich and powerful industry like the American Insurance Industry allowing the government to take away their chance to make a profit.                                        This does not compute.                                                                                             Unless you consider that the risk was too great to profitably underwrite. Period.

The most believable case is that the risk experts wanted no part of vaccines at any price. So we have the President and all the medical spokesmen telling us that we should subject our children to a risk that the risk experts have refused to accept.     What does that mean? How can the powers-that-be tell us to accept a risk that the risk experts consider unacceptable? Who’s interest is being served by this blatant misrepresentation of the facts? It is obviously not in the interest of your child.

There is no reason for the government to engage in the insurance business accept when it is the only alternative. Businesses cannot undertake unprofitable operations. Only the Govt. can do that.

Whenever it is brought up that “for profit health care” is not a particularly moral or efficient practice for a society, there is a big uproar about socialized medicine. The insurance industry spends millions “lobbying” to defeat any plan to create a publicly funded health care system that is health driven instead of profit driven. But they have shown to be perfectly willing to pass up the premiums that they could be charging for underwriting the risk of vaccines.

How can you explain that?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zombie Apocalypse Mitigation

mit·i·gate :   transitive verb  : to make (something) less severe, harmful, or painful

Actions in the present have consequences in the future.  If we look at the rising debt in the U.S., both individually and collectively, it appears that this universal truth is being ignored.  Our current culture does not recognize the difference between debt and income.  We have taken a bunch of the Earth’s resources and turned it into stuff and called it economic growth.  We have ignored the fact that the process of creating that stuff has incurred a debt in our environment. As Nature moves to collect on that debt we can expect changes in our world that will not necessarily be “human friendly”.  Here on Zombie Apocalypse Mitigation (ZAM) we will offer products, information and practices that can help make these changes “less severe,harmful or painful”.

Less refugees is better.